Climate change would be nice. Climate change is something we can all bite our ownselves in the ass about if we believe humans are the cause of it.
Similarly, a sort of general speculation it might be overfishing works well, so long as there’s no mention whether one particular nation is responsible more than the others. No mention, specifically of the city-sized fish factories operating year-round buying catches from any fishing boat capable of reaching them. Japanese fish factories operating in a devil-take-the-hindmost race to see whether they can get all the fish out of the North Pacific before Japanese radiation kills them. Stone deaf to the pleas of every nation on earth also depending on their fishing industries.
So yeah, maybe over harvesting of fish might be it.
Beats hell out of one other possibility nobody seems to be mentioning. The 900 pound gorilla. Personally I don’t know enough about it all to have an opinion. But I suspect the reason those fishing job related folks don’t mention the 900 pound gorilla possibility might be a desire to be able to catch and sell fish again sometime if the Pacific coast of North America ever has any again.
Maybe those radiation leaking Japanese nuke plants are being damned by faint praise.
Lost At Sea: Fishers Can’t Find Sardines and Climate Change May Be To Blame
The sardines off the western coast of Canada have completely disappeared.
No one knows exactly what has happened to the $32 million commercial fishery, but what we do know is stunning: The region’s sardine fishermen returned to port empty-handed after failing to catch a single fish according to a report Monday.
Poof! Vanished. Gone.
Although you may not eat sardines on a regular basis, (though we think you should), the health of this tiny forage fish has had scientists worried for some time.
Sardines, along with anchovy and menhaden, form the base of the food chain for species that range from bluefin tuna to humpback whales to sea birds and dolphins. Forage fish are critically important to the aquaculture industry as well, where they’re ground up, turned into fishmeal, and fed to popular species like farmed salmon.
Geoff Shester, a scientist with conservation group Oceana says they’ve been concerned about the Pacific sardine fishery for some time and warns that effects from a collapse could last for decades.
“This is about the entire Pacific coast including the U.S. and Mexico, not just British Columbia,” says Shester. “If fishermen have stopped fishing because they’ve hit their quota, that’s one thing. But they’re stopping because they can’t find any fish. That means fishery management is failing.”
Indeed, Oceana isn’t the only group worried. The collapse was predicted by prominent scientists who said ocean conditions—including a change in temperature—and poor reproduction rates are contributing to the sardines’ decline.At least one study has found that climate change is causing the geography of where fish are found to shift, which may be what we’re seeing in Canada, too.Fishing pressures on the ecosystem also play an important role.
When sardines are in a productive cycle, they can be fished agressively and their stock can withstand it, while leaving enough for ocean predators, Shester said.
“But if you don’t respond to a natural decline fast enough by limiting fishing, you’re suddenly in big trouble,” says Shester. “It makes the crash even worse because you’ll have fewer sardines remaining. When conditions get productive again, they can’t bounce back because there aren’t enough of them to begin with.”
Canada isn’t alone in declining sardine stocks. Paul Shively, forage fish campaign manager for Pew Charitable Trusts, says we’re seeing a similar trend in the U.S. The numbers are striking. In 2007, the U.S. brought in 127,500 metric tons of Pacific sardines. In 2010, the number shrunk to 66,817 metric tons, and by 2011 that number declined to 44,000 metric tons.
“We can’t do a lot about the changing temperatures of the ocean and the natural cycles it goes through, but what we can do is to keep from fishing the bottom out of that. We don’t want to fish those last remaining fish,” he said.
Shively is worried about more than just sardines. While sardines are protected under fishery management plans, he points out that there are no such protections for other important species like smelt, Pacific saury and lantern fish.
“If someone wants to fish them, there are no limits on what they can take,” says Shively.
As for the sardine fishery, Shester says we should be paying close attention to the news coming from Canada.
“We’re in an emergency situation right now. Any fishing is overfishing when the stock is in this condition.”
Not to suggest if it’s actually the nukes doing it the Japanese are at fault in any way. Any more than they’d be at fault if it were found to be their giant fish factories doing it.
I’ve always figured climate change was what caused the Rape of Nanking, the Bataan Death March and Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It all runs together. Karma sort of thing.
Kind of like the canary in the mineshaft.
Glow in the dark canary, I reckons. Jack
Maybe the fish left the area because they could detect the radiation or just didn’t like the dirty waters and no one has found them because they are where no one fishes. Just saying, maybe nature has it’s on reason fish can’t be found. Blessings. Mary
Mary: Nature’s frequently had reasons why fish couldn’t be found when I had a rod and reel and fishing license. No reason she shouldn’t do it to others. Even things out. Gracias, Jack